Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Irish Medical Journal ; 114(4):322, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1842614

ABSTRACT

Introduction Video consultation involves the live interaction between the doctor and the patient remotely. Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, the majority of video consultations in primary care were provided by GPs who were not the individual's own GP, which presented safety and continuity issues. This study aims to determine GPs' attitudes to the use of video consultation for their own patients. Methods This was a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. Participants were purposively recruited through use of a GP tutor as a key informant and guided by a sampling framework to include those with and without previous video consultation experience. Braun and Clarke thematic analysis was used. Results Participants included eight GPs, half of whom had previously worked with video consultation. Four themes emerged: impact on the consultation, the potential role, and the potential threat to current practice and technology and logistics. There were optimistic and cautious observations within all themes. Conclusion With the increased use of video consultation, Irish General Practice is in a unique position to frame the future its use. The provision of this modality to one's own patients may provide benefit while mitigating some of the pitfalls but would not entirely avoid the potential dangers of video consultation.

2.
Irish Medical Journal ; 114(4), 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1292309

ABSTRACT

Introduction Video consultation involves the live interaction between the doctor and the patient remotely. Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, the majority of video consultations in primary care were provided by GPs who were not the individual’s own GP, which presented safety and continuity issues. This study aims to determine GPs’ attitudes to the use of video consultation for their own patients. Methods This was a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews. Participants were purposively recruited through use of a GP tutor as a key informant and guided by a sampling framework to include those with and without previous video consultation experience. Braun and Clarke thematic analysis was used. Results Participants included eight GPs, half of whom had previously worked with video consultation. Four themes emerged: Impact on the consultation, the potential role, and the potential threat to current practice and technology and logistics. There were optimistic and cautious observations within all themes. Conclusion With the increased use of video consultation, Irish General Practice is in a unique position to frame the future its use. The provision of this modality to one’s own patients may provide benefit while mitigating some of the pitfalls but would not entirely avoid the potential dangers of video consultation. © 2021, Irish Medical Association. All rights reserved.

3.
O'Toole, A.; Hill, V.; Pybus, O. G.; Watts, A.; Bogoch, II, Khan, K.; Messina, J. P.; consortium, Covid- Genomics UK, Network for Genomic Surveillance in South, Africa, Brazil, U. K. Cadde Genomic Network, Tegally, H.; Lessells, R. R.; Giandhari, J.; Pillay, S.; Tumedi, K. A.; Nyepetsi, G.; Kebabonye, M.; Matsheka, M.; Mine, M.; Tokajian, S.; Hassan, H.; Salloum, T.; Merhi, G.; Koweyes, J.; Geoghegan, J. L.; de Ligt, J.; Ren, X.; Storey, M.; Freed, N. E.; Pattabiraman, C.; Prasad, P.; Desai, A. S.; Vasanthapuram, R.; Schulz, T. F.; Steinbruck, L.; Stadler, T.; Swiss Viollier Sequencing, Consortium, Parisi, A.; Bianco, A.; Garcia de Viedma, D.; Buenestado-Serrano, S.; Borges, V.; Isidro, J.; Duarte, S.; Gomes, J. P.; Zuckerman, N. S.; Mandelboim, M.; Mor, O.; Seemann, T.; Arnott, A.; Draper, J.; Gall, M.; Rawlinson, W.; Deveson, I.; Schlebusch, S.; McMahon, J.; Leong, L.; Lim, C. K.; Chironna, M.; Loconsole, D.; Bal, A.; Josset, L.; Holmes, E.; St George, K.; Lasek-Nesselquist, E.; Sikkema, R. S.; Oude Munnink, B.; Koopmans, M.; Brytting, M.; Sudha Rani, V.; Pavani, S.; Smura, T.; Heim, A.; Kurkela, S.; Umair, M.; Salman, M.; Bartolini, B.; Rueca, M.; Drosten, C.; Wolff, T.; Silander, O.; Eggink, D.; Reusken, C.; Vennema, H.; Park, A.; Carrington, C.; Sahadeo, N.; Carr, M.; Gonzalez, G.; Diego, Search Alliance San, National Virus Reference, Laboratory, Seq, Covid Spain, Danish Covid-19 Genome, Consortium, Communicable Diseases Genomic, Network, Dutch National, Sars-CoV-surveillance program, Division of Emerging Infectious, Diseases, de Oliveira, T.; Faria, N.; Rambaut, A.; Kraemer, M. U. G..
Wellcome Open Research ; 6:121, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1259748

ABSTRACT

Late in 2020, two genetically-distinct clusters of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with mutations of biological concern were reported, one in the United Kingdom and one in South Africa. Using a combination of data from routine surveillance, genomic sequencing and international travel we track the international dispersal of lineages B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 (variant 501Y-V2). We account for potential biases in genomic surveillance efforts by including passenger volumes from location of where the lineage was first reported, London and South Africa respectively. Using the software tool grinch (global report investigating novel coronavirus haplotypes), we track the international spread of lineages of concern with automated daily reports, Further, we have built a custom tracking website (cov-lineages.org/global_report.html) which hosts this daily report and will continue to include novel SARS-CoV-2 lineages of concern as they are detected.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL